Legal Opinion

Martha Roe v. Jack Humke

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1997No. 96-3952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Martha Roe, suing individually and as the mother and guardian of Jane Doe, appeals from the district court’s2 adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The sole issue on appeal is whether defendant Jack Humke was acting under col- or of state law at the time he sexually assaulted Jane Doe. We conclude that he was not, and thus we affirm.

Because this is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to Roe, the nonmoving party. See McCormack v. Citibank, N.A., 100 F.3d 532, 534 (8th Cir. 1996). At…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roe v. HumkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API