Legal Opinion

Roe v. Humke

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1997No. 96-3952PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

128 F.3d 1213

Martha ROE, individually and as Mother and next friend of

Jane Doe, a minor; Metropolitan National Bank, as

Guardian of the Estate of Jane Doe, a

minor, Appellants,

v.

Jack HUMKE, individually and in his official capacity as an

officer in the City of Lonoke Police Department; Floyd Van

Horn, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of

the City of Lonoke Police Department, Appellees.

No. 96-3952.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 1997.

Decided Oct. 30, 1997.

Christopher R. Heil, Little Rock, AR, argued (Morgan E. Welch, on the brief), for Appellants.

Ral…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Robin Magee v. Trustees of Hamline UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Ottman v. City of IndependenceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Lawrence v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  4. Angela Lee v. Albert BordersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Kinman v. Omaha Public School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API