Legal Opinion

Hettel v. Rye

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1972No. 5-5719PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

Following a traffic accident the appellant, Alfred B. Hettel, brought this action for personal injuries against Charles M. Rye. Upon Rye’s death a few months later, the cause was revived against his administrator, one of the appellees. The other appellee, Northwestern National Insurance Company, is the plaintiff’s own insurer, whom the plaintiff brought into the case for the assertion of a cause of action under the uninsured motorist clause in the policy. Although the original cause was revived against Rye’s administrator, the plaintiff failed to file a copy of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Booth v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Sahloff v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Reese v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Wolfe v. HerndonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boyle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. HatfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PrestonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jenkins v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. PettieCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API