Langlois v. Dunn Worsted Mills
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Trespass on the Case.
1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.
The first, second, and fourth counts of the declaration are demurred to. The first two counts set forth, in substance, that the plaintiff was employed to work on a machine which was defective for want of a lever to stop it when in motion; that the plaintiff was fourteen years of age, of immature intelligence and feeble memory; that it suddenly became necessary to put the geared wheel out of gear; that he "momentarily forgot the absence of said lever” and in haste reached for the place where the lever should have been, and his hand became caught in the geared wheels.
We think the first two…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Maley v. South Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Knisley v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Galveston City Railroad v. HewittTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Buckley v. Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Dimmey v. Wheeling & E. G. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Osterholm v. Boston & Montana Con. C. & S. Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
- Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. NorgateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Denver City Tramway Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Umsted ex rel. Umsted v. Colgate Farmers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.