Legal Opinion

Caserotti v. State Farm Insurance

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 10, 1990No. 05-89-01000-CVPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEWART, Justice.

Nancy Ray Caserotti (“Nancy”) appeals from the entry of a summary judgment against her and in favor of appellee, State Farm Insurance Company (“State Farm”). In her sole point of error, Nancy contends that the trial court erred in granting State Farm’s motion for summary judgment because there exist genuine issues of material fact which preclude summary judgment as a matter of law. In its sole cross-point, State Farm asserts that the trial court erred in denying its rule 13 1 motion and that Nancy’s appeal is frivolous. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

FACTS

Thi…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hoover v. Gregory, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. Wheeler v. Yettie Kersting Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Herrig v. HerrigWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Central Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Stemmons Northwest Bank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Emscor Manufacturing, Inc. v. Alliance Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API