Legal Opinion

State v. Sloan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1953No. 291PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The motion entered by defendant must be treated as a motion to quash the warrant for that the Recorder’s Court of Craven County has no jurisdiction of the offense therein charged. The appeal from the judgment allowing the motion requires an examination of ch. 277, P.L. 1919, now General Statutes, ch. 7, subchapter VI, art. 24 and 25, which authorizes the creation of Municipal Recorders’ Courts and County Recorders’ Courts.

In 1919 the General Assembly enacted this statute “to establish a uniform system of recorders’ courts for municipalities and counties . . .” Proceeding under this Act, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State v. BallengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API