Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Roeben

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 20, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

Upon the hearing in this application to remove the ancillary coexecutrix and to revoke her ancillary letters testamentary, the petitioning coexecutor and ancillary coexecutor offered in evidence the following four documents: (1) Copy of the order of the Bergen County Orphans Court, dated May 13, 1936, revoking the respondent’s letters testamentary and removing her from her office of coexecutrix; (2) copy of the decree and remittitur of the New Jersey Prerogative Court, dated March 11, 1938, affirming such revocation and removal; (3) copy of the order of affirmance and remittitur…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Helme v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Andrews v. MontgomeryNew York Supreme Court · 1821
  4. Lockwood v. United States Steel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Durant v. . AbendrothNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Baughan v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. United States Plywood Corp. v. Hudson Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. In re the Estate of HohmNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  5. In re the Estate of NordhauserNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API