Legal Opinion

Morgan Const. Co. v. Forter-Miller Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 10, 1914No. 1775PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; James S. Young, Judge. Suit in equity by the Morgan Construction Company and Alexander Daughlin against the Forter-Miller Engineering Company and Dilworth, Porter & Co., Limited. Decree for defendants, and complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below the Morgan Construction Company and Alexander Laughlin, the plaintiffs, by a bill in equity charged the Forter-Miller Engineering Company and Lfilworth, Porter & Company, Limited, with infringing claims 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of a patent of which plaintiffs were respectively owner and licensee, viz., patent No. 632,020, applied for August 3, 1896, and granted August 29, 1896, to Charles H. Morgan for a furnace for heating ingots. On final hearing that court held the patent not infringed. From a decree in accord therewith, the plaintiffs took this appeal.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. J. L. Mott Iron Works v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morgan Const. Co. v. Forter-Miller Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API