Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 8, 1985No. 22-HPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss certain exceptions to an accounting by the Govern*161ment has been treated as a motion for summary judgment, which plaintiff has opposed. See White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 1, 10-11, 13 (1985) (the “September 20 order”).
Considering whether these exceptions should remain in litigation is a different matter than determining whether plaintiff should be allowed to introduce at this stage of proceedings new supplemental accounting requests (some of which, in fact, duplicate the earlier-filed exceptions). See September 20…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990