Saldana v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD BARAJAS, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of simulating legal process. The jury assessed punishment at nine (9) months’ confinement and a fine of $2,500. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
I. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE
Appellant was charged by complaint and information for three offenses of simulating legal process. All three cases were tried at the same time. Appellant represented himself pro-se. At trial, the State utilized the testimony of Sergeant Mike Tacker of the Odessa Police Department. He worked as a detective for the Office of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Gollihar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Runningwolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- RUNNINGWOLF v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
- Esau Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- Howard Kirk Gibbs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Howard Kirk Gibbs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.