Legal Opinion
Runningwolf v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 7, 2012No. PD-0997-10PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMeyers, J.
in which PRICE, KEASLER, HERVEY, COCHRAN, and ALCALA, JJ., joined.
Michael Runningwolf appealed his conviction for simulating legal process under Texas Penal Code § 32.48, claiming that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict. The Amarillo Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Runningwolf v. State, 317 S.W.3d 829 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2010, pet. granted). This Court granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to resolve a conflict among the courts of appeals regarding the appropriate way to determine whether a document simulates legal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Robert Infante v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
- Christopher Allen Gillette v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
- Cedrick Lamar Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Robert William Cornwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
- Bakari Abdul Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.