Legal Opinion

Evans v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 6, 1913No. 65PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. • The facts, which involve the right under § 1765, Rev. Stat., of-an employe of a Department to extra compensation for additional services, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

This case comes here on appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing appellant’s petition after hearing the merits and denying a motion for a new trial. 44 Ct. Cl. 549; 45 Ct. Cl. 169. Briefly, the facts are that the appellant, who was a chief of division and disbursing clerk of the Interior Department, receiving a salary of $2,000 per year, and was also disbursing clerk of the architect- of the Capitol, for which he received annual compensation of $1,000, was- appointed by the Secretary of the Interior on August 10, 1901, to act as a special disbursing agent to disburse an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodwell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Evans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1909
  3. Evans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wedderburn v. WedderburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  2. Ward v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API