Legal Opinion

Chemical Dynamics, Inc. v. Newfeld

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1987No. 51468PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Chemical Dynamics, Inc., d/b/a The Schultz Co. (corporation), appeals from the judgment, in a court-tried case, in favor of defendants, Lawrence Newfeld, Frieda Newfeld, his wife, Harry Schultz, Darlene Schultz, his wife, and Sol Schultz, in an action based upon defendants’ purchase of certain real estate allegedly in violation of their fiduciary duties as directors of the corporation. We affirm.

The record reveals that corporation is a closely held family corporation with 40 outstanding shares, 23 of which are held either by the Schultz family or by the Schultz…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Ramacciotti v. Joe Simpkins, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Paulman v. KritzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Punch v. Hipolite Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Nicholson v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Havlicek/Fleisher Enterprises, Inc. v. BridgemanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
  2. Newfeld v. Chemical Dynamics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API