Legal Opinion

City of Little Rock v. Moreland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 4, 1960No. 5-1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

In building a reservoir in connection with the city water supply system, the City of Little Rock acquired 15,000 acres of land west of the City. Of the property sought to he condemned, 1,300 acres belonged to the appellees, hereinafter referred to as the Morelands. To acquire the 1,300 acres the City filed condemnation proceedings. Upon a trial of the issues the City was allowed to condemn only 1,165.1 acres of the Moreland property, for which the owners were given judgment in the sum of $211,425, which amounts to about $181 per acre. Both sides have appealed.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Selle v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Tyson Creek Railroad v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ark. State Highway Commission v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. San Diego County Water Authority v. MireiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Ark. State Highway Commission v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Ark. State Highway Commission v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API