Legal Opinion
United Steelworkers v. Galland-Henning Mfg. Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 12, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 6174PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEHAN, Chief Judge.
The defendant Galland-Henning Mfg. Co. has moved the Court pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the amended complaint and the amended petition herein upon the grounds that this Court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter involved and said amended complaint and amended petition fail to state any claim upon which relief can be granted. No suggestion having been made that there are any questions of fact involved on this motion, we shall proceed to take up the legal questions involved.
The specific question presented here…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- The Anaconda v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Local 19, Warehouse, Processing & Distributive Workers Union v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- United Steelworkers of America, C.I.O., and Walter Burke v. Galland-Henning Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Local 19, Warehouse, Processing And Distributive Workers Union, Retail, Wholesale And Department Store Union, Appellant v. The Buckeye Cotton Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956