Legal Opinion

SunCoke Energy Inc. v. Man Ferrostaal Aktiengesellschaft

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2009No. 08-5414PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity action for injunctive relief seeking the return of confidential trade information generated and provided by SunCoke Co. of Knoxville, Tennessee to the defendant, MAN Ferrostaal, a German engineering and construction company. Relying on the Tennessee long-arm statute, SunCoke brought suit in federal court in Knoxville, where its principal place of business is located. The District Court dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. It held that the activities of the German corporation did not create a sufficiently “substantial connection with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Tryg International Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Susan McKnight, Inc. v. United Industries Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017
  2. Morris Aviation, LLC v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010
  3. Branstetter v. Holland America Line N.V. LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
  4. Christopher Boling v. Prospect Funding Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. Demag Cranes & Components Corp. v. Pinnacle Industrial ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API