Legal Opinion

Easiley v. Norris

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 9, 2000No. 4:99-cv-00196PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KERN, Chief Judge.

On July 24, 2000, Magistrate Judge Joyner filed his Report and Recommendation, in which he recommended that defendant’s application for attorney’s fees be denied. No objection has been filed and the time for doing so under Rule 72(b) F.R.Cv.P. has elapsed. Further, the Court has independently reviewed the Report and Recommendation and sees no reason to depart from it.

It is the Order of the Court that the Report and Recommendation (# 163) is hereby adopted and affirmed. The application of the defendant for attorney’s fees (# 147) is DENIED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOYNER,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bratton v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API