Legal Opinion

Harkrader v. Reed

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided June 1, 1917No. 1506-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, District Judge.

The motion for a new trial In this cause sets forth several grounds, but it will be unnecessary to notice any of the grounds assigned, except that which contends that the court erred in rejecting testimony as to the reputation of Eillie Clark and testimony as to the declarations of George Harkrader and Eillie Clark.

Complaint is made of the ruling of the court at the hearing of the testimony of Antone Marks, Peter Schramen, Gudman Jensen, J. T. Martin, and Cyrus Sheldon.

As to the testimony of Antone Marks, the objection in dispute arose in the following way: Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Imboden v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Topper v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Craufurd v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  4. Washington v. . Bank for SavingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Whitney v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. (PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology SolutionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. Brooks Jr v. BallardDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2024
  3. Grayton v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  4. Nwaigwe v. County of San Diego Child Support ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Simms v. Charles R SchwabDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API