(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARRISON JONES, Case No. 2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT: 13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BE 14 VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART SOLUTIONS, 15 ECF No. 43 Defendant. 16 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS 17 18 On July 31, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that it alleged a 19 potentially cognizable Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) claim against defendant Velocity 20 Technology Solutions. ECF No. 29. The court asked…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.