Schlict v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Ripley Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
Schlict, the appellant, was tried on an information for selling intoxicating liquors on Sunday, found guilty, and fined forty dollars and costs.
The information ivas based on the 8th section of the act to license and regulate the sale of intoxicating liquors, &e., as amended in 1865 (Acts Spec. Sess. p. 197), and alleged, that the appellant was licensed under said act “ to sell intox*247ieating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time.”
A motion for a new trial was made, urging several reasons therefor, one of which was, that the finding of the court was contrary to the evidence. The…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Keiser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Wiles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- City of Montpelier v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- McHale v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.