Legal Opinion

Quaker Hill, Inc. v. Parr

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 25, 1961No. 19606PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Doyle.

The plaintiff in error, to which we will refer as Quaker Hill or plaintiff, was plaintiff in the trial court in an action to recover the sum of $14,503.56 from defendants, defendants in error here. Judgment was in favor of the defendants, and Quaker Hill seeks review.

In May 1958 the plaintiff, a New York corporation with offices in Newark, New York, sold a large quantity of nursery stock to the Denver Memorial Nursery, Inc. A sales contract, together with a promissory note, was executed on May 19, 1958, and the Denver Memorial Nursery, Inc., was named as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Case Manufacturing Co. v. SoxmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hersey v. TullyColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Tucker v. Colorado Indoor Trap Shoot, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Mershon Gimeno Construction Co. v. RobinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. FoxColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API