Legal Opinion

Miskunas v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 8, 1976No. 61560PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dieringer

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Cook County entered on September 13,1974, sustaining the defendant’s motion to dismiss after the close of the plaintiff’s case.

The issue on appeal is whether the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence such that no contrary verdict based upon that evidence could ever stand.

On January 6, 1971, the plaintiff, then aged 38, rode a Chicago Transit Authority bus home from work and got off at the northeast corner of Albany and 39th Streets in the City of Chicago. She was wearing boots with low, flat heels, and she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Katamay v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Gauchas v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Perzovsky v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Wasserman v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API