Legal Opinion

State v. Dukes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 8, 2006No. A06A0551PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether police officers had probable cause to arrest Timothy Dukes for obstruction. Because the officers did not have probable cause to arrest Dukes, the trial court correctly granted Dukes’ motion to suppress evidence of suspected cocaine found after the unlawful arrest.

“In reviewing a ruling on a motion to suppress, we construe the evidence most favorably toward upholding the trial court’s findings and judgment. We apply a de novo standard of review to the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts.” In the instant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Fincher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Peters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Leon-Velazquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. EWUMI v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Galindo-Eriza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API