Holmes v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Chief Judge.
Following a bench trial, Michael Holmes appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia, contending that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.
On appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, this Court must construe the evidence most favorably to uphold the ruling of the trial court. State v. Winnie. Furthermore, the trial court’s application of law to facts which are undisputed is subject to de novo review. Id.
The facts of this case are undisputed. The record shows…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- State v. WinnieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- McAdoo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.