Legal Opinion

McManigle v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket No. 29PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Case by Archibald J. McManigle against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.

On the 12th day of June, 1913, plaintiff was hit by a street car on Dix avenue, in the city of Detroit, and severely injured. At the trial a verdict was directed for defendant upon the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

*531Dix avenue runs in an easterly and westerly direction, and upon it defendant has a double track for its cars. The northerly track is used for west-bound cars, and the southerly track for cars going east. Livernois avenue intersects Dix avenue from the north, but does not extend beyond it towards the south. Livernois avenue also has a double street car…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Putnam v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reichle v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hershey v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API