Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 24, 2012No. 65172-2-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, J. *

¶1 — Terry Grant was convicted of first degree robbery and first degree kidnapping. Relying upon *498State v. Green1 and State v. Korum,2 he contends his kidnapping conviction violated due process because the restraint of the victim was merely incidental to the robbery and was therefore not sufficient to support a separate kidnapping conviction.

¶2 We reject Grant’s reading of Green and decline to follow Korum. It is well settled that separate convictions for first degree robbery and first degree kidnapping do not violate double jeopardy, regardless of the incidental nature of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Rattana Keo PhuongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Personal Restraint Petition Of: Albert Jamal YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API