State v. Berg
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 We consider whether there is sufficient evidence to support a kidnapping charge if the conduct constituting kidnapping is incidental to a separately charged crime of robbery. Defendants Daylan Berg and Jeffrey Reed were convicted of robbery in the first degree and kidnapping in the first degree in violation of RCW 9A.56.200 and RCW 9A.40.020. On appeal, Division Two of the Court of Appeals held that because the only evidence of kidnapping was conduct incidental to the robbery, the evidence of kidnapping was insufficient under the due process clause. U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1; Wash.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. RichWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MuhammadWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State of Washington v. Travis Vern LahmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Derek WhittakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington, V Treven A. PerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.