Legal Opinion

Estate of Hunnewell v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 16, 1945No. Docket No. 4151PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Aenold, Judge:

Respondent contends that the value of the transferred property which at decedent’s death was still subject to the possibility of reverting to decedent’s estate is includible in gross estate under section 811 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code,1 on the theory that the transfer was intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after death. Petitioners claim that there was no such intent accompanying the transfer; that decedent’s death could have had no effect whatsoever on the interests of the beneficiaries; and that no part of the transferred property is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Frances Biddle Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  4. Fahnestock v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  5. Allen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  2. Hughes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Estate of Eckhardt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  4. Duncan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  5. Friedman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API