Legal Opinion

Layton City v. Peronek

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 28, 1990No. 900025-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Judge:

Defendant appeals from an order finding she violated the terms of her probation and imposing an additional term of incarceration and an additional fine as a consequence. We reverse.

FACTS

On October 17, 1989, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of Reckless Driving, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-45 (1988). The court sentenced defendant to sixty days in jail, a $600 fine, and twelve months probation. The court suspended all but four days of the jail time, and imposed a fine and assessments totaling $575. As a term of probation, the court ordered that defendant not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Bruce BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Murray City v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Utley v. Mill Man Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Wassillie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. State v. TateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API