Legal Opinion

Langford v. Freeman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant.

The complaint contained three paragraphs.

A demurrer to each paragraph for want of sufficient facts was filed, and sustained as to the second, hut overruled as to the first and third.

Such further proceedings were had, as that final judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.

The assignments of error call in question the correctness of the rulings in respect to the first and third paragraphs.

The first paragraph alleged, in substance, that the defendant was the mother of Eugene J. Holden, deceased; that the said Holden was indebted to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Leonard v. BlairIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Berkshire v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Krutz v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Emerick v. SandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ForsythIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Carr v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Hunt v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ice v. BallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API