Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Pena

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 28, 1995No. 94 C 5416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Plaintiff Douglas Hartman complains that he was a victim of “Malehook,” 1 the inverse of the infamous 1991 Tailhook Convention, at a cultural diversity workshop (“CDW’) sponsored by his employer, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). Hartman alleges that, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, he suffered sexual harassment and religious discrimination at the CDW, and retaliation for having filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Before the court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Valerie A. Baskerville v. Culligan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. John T. Russell v. Acme-Evans Company, Adm Milling Company, and Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finnane v. Pentel of America, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  2. Carlton v. RyanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0505, Texas Attorney General Reports2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API