Finnane v. Pentel of America, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant Pentel of America, Ltd.’s (“Pentel”) Motion to Dismiss and to Strike portions of Count I of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and to Dismiss Counts II-V. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
ALLEGED FACTS 1
In 1991, Pentel, an office supply distribution company with its principal place of business in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, hired Plaintiff Susan Finnane (“Finnane”) as a consumer representative. Four years later in 1995, Pentel promoted Finnane to the position of sales…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fuesting v. Uline, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Alvarez v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Zakaras v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Carwyle v. Anna Hospital Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2015
- Long v. Illinois Municipal Electric AgencyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.