Legal Opinion

Edward E. Holt and Josephine Holt v. Boyle Brothers, Inc., a Corporation, Trading & Doing Business as Regal of Washington, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 6, 1954No. 11785PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

The Holts, husband and wife, sued Boyle Brothers, Inc., herein called Boyle, for slander, libel and malicious abuse of process. The District Court directed a verdict for the defendant and the plaintiffs appeal.

The essential facts are undisputed. Holt is a civilian employee of the United States at the Naval Research Laboratory. Boyle is a corporation engaged in the retail clothing business. Though the Holts had never dealt with Boyle and owed Boyle nothing, Boyle telephoned Holt at the Laboratory and demanded payment of an alleged debt. Holt assured Boyle that neither…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peck v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Soffos v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Peckham v. Union Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  4. Thackrey v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Boyle Bros. v. HoltDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mike J. Morfessis v. Norman Baum and Lois SchenkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. Weaver v. Beneficial Finance CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  3. Haynes v. Alverno Heights HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. GOLDEN COMMISSARY CORPORATION v. ShipleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Consolidated Indus v. Enodis CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API