GOLDEN COMMISSARY CORPORATION v. Shipley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
A seven days’ trial has produced here a record containing more than 1,200 pages of reporter’s transcript with voluminous exhibits, and yet we find the material facts of the case largely undisputed. Appellants say that the lengthy trial and bulky record are due to appellee’s filing of a general denial, thereby forcing appellants to prove many facts which should have been admitted. Appellee counters by saying that the complaint, instead of containing a short and plain statement of the claim, was so lengthy, vague and redundant that it could not be intelligently answered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peck v. HeurichSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Melvin v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Hall v. Hollywood Credit Clothing CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Soffos v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Peckham v. Union Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Feld Entertainment, Inc. v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Alexander v. Unification Church of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Koro Co., Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Security Underground Storage, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Design for Business Interiors, Inc. v. Herson's, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.