Secrest, Et Ux. v. R.I.W. Waterproofing Decorating
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The appeal is from an order appointing a Receiver in a mortgage foreclosure case. There was no prayer in the bill of complaint for the appointment of a Receiver.
After decree pro confesso had been entered against the appellant and others, application was made without notice for the appointment of Receiver. On application of R. I. W. AVaterproofing & Decorating Co., Inc., verified under oath, Receiver was appointed.
The pertinent allegation of the petition was:
“That the property is in possession of the plaintiff and one parcel of the property is in possession of R. M. Secrest and Virginia L.…
2Cited by1 opinion
- R. W. Holding Corp. v. R. I. W. Waterproofing & Decorating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938