Legal Opinion

Secrest, Et Ux. v. R.I.W. Waterproofing Decorating

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 29, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The appeal is from an order appointing a Receiver in a mortgage foreclosure case. There was no prayer in the bill of complaint for the appointment of a Receiver.

After decree pro confesso had been entered against the appellant and others, application was made without notice for the appointment of Receiver. On application of R. I. W. AVaterproofing & Decorating Co., Inc., verified under oath, Receiver was appointed.

The pertinent allegation of the petition was:

“That the property is in possession of the plaintiff and one parcel of the property is in possession of R. M. Secrest and Virginia L.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. R. W. Holding Corp. v. R. I. W. Waterproofing & Decorating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API