Legal Opinion

White v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1992No. WD 44882PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Presiding Judge.

Hyde Park Center Developers, Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority (LCRA), and Luzier Personal Cosmetics, Inc., are involved in a dispute over who gets to develop a tract of land in Kansas City. Hyde Park and Luzier were competitive bidders for the project. LCRA first chose Hyde Park, but then it gave the project to Luzier when Hyde Park defaulted on its contract obligations.

Hyde Park sued LCRA. It claimed that LCRA had no justification for taking the project away from it. It sued Luzier and LCRA on the ground that each interfered with its ability to perform its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Downey v. United Weatherproofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Peterson v. Continental Boiler Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Aluminum Products Enterprises, Inc. v. Fuhrmann Tooling and Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Winters v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Zipper v. Health MidwestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. MacKe Laundry Service Ltd. Partnership v. Jetz Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Slankard v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Sloan v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API