Legal Opinion

Chro Ex. Rel. John Doe v. Travel Tour, No. Cv 92 0519557 (Jul. 12, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 12, 1994No. CV 92 0519557Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT On December 11, 1992, the plaintiff, the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities [CHRO], filed a "petition to enforce an order of a presiding officer of the CHRO," against the defendants, Travel and Tour Services [Travel and Tour] and William Kenney. The CHRO seeks to enforce a judgment, rendered by the CHRO on June 27, 1989, against Travel and Tour. The underlying judgment against Travel and Tour was based on a finding that Travel and Tour had discriminated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Lees v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API