Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Precision Rubber Products Corp.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 8, 1984PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNER, Judge.

This is an appeal of a jury verdict rendered against defendant-appellant, Precision Rubber Products, in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Lawrence Woodrow Mullins, 1 who was awarded $125,000.00 due to injuries sustained during a fall on defendant’s premises. The sole issues involve the applicability as a matter of law of the doctrines of assumption of the risk and contributory negligence.

The incident giving rise to the complaint occurred in June of 1980 when the plaintiff, a truck driver, came to defendant’s plant to pick up products for his employer. Mr. Mullins, age 49, was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crosslin v. AlsupTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Tate v. County of MonroeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  4. Overstreet v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. O'Brien v. Smith Bros. Engine Rebuilders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bills v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. Cortez v. Alutech, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  3. Hobson v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Wagner v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Arrow Electronics v. Adecco Employment Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API