Legal Opinion

Tate v. County of Monroe

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 28, 1978PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARROTT, Presiding Judge (E.S.).

The plaintiffs, Stanford Tate and his wife, brought this inverse condemnation suit against Monroe County alleging damages from the construction of the Madison-ville By-Pass. Plaintiffs owned and operated a business, Tate Builders Supply, which originally fronted on old Highway 411. With the construction of the by-pass, old 411 became a service road which was completely terminated to the north of the plaintiffs’ property. The only ingress and egress to the new 411 by-pass was a ramp built to the south. There was no property of the plaintiffs physically…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jerkins v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Shelby County v. BardenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Illinois Cent. R. v. MoriarityTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State v. RascoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Brookside Mills, Inc. v. MoultonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. Pneumo Services Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  2. Tennessee Department of Human Services v. BarbeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Tennessee State Bank v. LayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Bills v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  5. John Barb, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API