Legal Opinion

New York Ex Rel. Clyde v. Gilchrist

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 30, 1923No. 318PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a statutory proceeding to recover the amount of taxes for 1919 paid under duress and protest. As the first step the relator, the plaintiff in error, filed an application for a revision of the tax with the Comptroller of the State. His determination presented the issue in a few words. The relator held bonds secured by mortgages upon which latter the mortgage recording tax under Article XI of the Tax Law had been paid. She also held secured debts upon which a tax had been paid under Article XV of the Tax Law as amended by c. 802 of the Laws of 1911. An additional assessment was made…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. William E. Peck & Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. CroslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Detroit United Railway v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hale v. State Bd. of Assessment and ReviewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Hunton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Fort Wayne National Corp. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1993
  5. Hale v. Iowa State Board of Assessment & ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API