Legal Opinion
Harper v. Remington Arms Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.
The questions requiring consideration at this time are presented by motions to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint made at the trial of this action.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant.
From the facts educed at the trial, it appeared that the plaintiff on November 1, 1930, while in the vicinity of Chester Heights, Penn., went hunting for rabbits. The weapon owned and used by the plaintiff was a double-barreled breech-loading shotgun manufactured by the Baltimore Arms Company and was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rosebrock v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Genesee County Patrons Fire Relief Ass'n v. L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Boronkay v. Robinson & CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Bernstein v. Crazy Eddie, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Littlehale v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Adelbert Littlehale and Erwin Zelanko v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.