Legal Opinion

Adelbert Littlehale and Erwin Zelanko v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 29, 1967No. 30720_1PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

Adelbert Littlehale and Erwin Zelanko appeal from a judgment by Judge Ten-ney of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, which dismissed their claims against du Pont upon the latter’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Appellants’ action, which sought money damages, was based upon the claimed negligence of du Pont in failing to adequately warn them of the dangers inherent in the use of certain detonators (blasting caps) that it had manufactured. The essential facts are not disputed, are fully set forth in Judge Tenney’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Littlehale v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Harper v. Remington Arms Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  2. Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Norman I. Suchomajcz, Administrator of the Estate of Norman Suchomajcz, a Minor v. Hummel Chemical Company, Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API