Legal Opinion

State v. District Court

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 10, 1904PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Certiorari from Taylor District Court.— Hon. R. L. Parrish, Judge. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

A fine having been assessed against the petitioner by the trial court for an. alleged contempt, a writ of certiorari has been sued out for a review of said proceedings. The return made to the writ simply certifies the record entry of the judgment of the district court, which is in the following words:

" State of Iowa v. F. L. Arthaud. Be it remembered that on this 4th day of March, 1903, at the February term of this court, F. L. Arthaud, being an attorney in attendance upon said court, having been, in the judgment of the court, guilty of contemptuous and insolent behavior towards said court,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. Dorgan v. GrangerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. State v. DuffySupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  4. Skiff v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  5. State v. FolsomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Knox v. Municipal Court of City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. State ex rel. Rankin v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Watson v. CharltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. State v. BuddressWashington Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API