Legal Opinion

State Bar of Texas v. Tinning

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 28, 1994No. 13-92-270-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

We issued our original opinion in this case on October 14,1993. We withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following as this court’s opinion.

Appellant and appellee have both filed motions for rehearing. Appellant argues that the general four-year statute of limitations does not apply to disciplinary actions. We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, reverse the judgment of the trial court, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing.

The trial court entered…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Laman v. Big Spring State Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1998
  5. Brown v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API