Legal Opinion
T. & P. R'y Co. v. Carlton
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1883No. Case No. 1554PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Kauffman. Tried below before the lion. Green J. Clark.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
The cause of action in this case, as stated in brief of counsel for appellant, is found to be substantially correct, and is as follows:
“Plaintiff, brought this suit against the defendant for damages, alleging that defendant unlawfully and wrongfully procured and caused the plaintiff’s son, William Jefferson Carlton, of the age of eighteen years, or about that age, under the parental authority and control of plaintiff, without his consent to quit the service of plaintiff and to enter into that of defendant, whereby plaintiff was deprived of the services’and society…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Hill v. GustIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. HarneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Houston & Great Northern Railroad v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Hamilton v. G. H. & S. A. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. HinzieTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. Farmers & Merchants National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrickTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. CrowderTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Tucker v. National Loan and Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.