Legal Opinion
Schlusselberg v. Rubin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 10, 1971No. 6135PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PRESLAR, Justice.
This is a suit for declaratory judgment to construe a renewal option provision of a lease agreement between the parties. Appellant is the lessee, and appellees are' lessors. The court, sitting without a jury, declared the paragraph in question to be void and unenforceable as to either party. We affirm.
The lease agreement provided that it was to commence on the first day of June, 1965, and was to end on the 31st day of May, 1970. It was on a printed form with blank spaces filled in by typewriter. The only provision relating to any renewal or extension of the lease was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hall v. WeatherfordArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Walker v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Horn v. Builders Supply Co. of Longview, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Hume v. BogleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Pickrell v. BucklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gerdes v. Mustang Exploration Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Etheridge v. RamzyMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
- Aycock v. Vantage Management Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Kaplan v. Floeter, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.