Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Fred N. Kirkes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2013No. CV-12-0120-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This case addresses whether a spouse, at death, can leave more than one-half of a community-owned retirement account to a non-spouse beneficiary. We conclude that, absent unusual circumstances, the deceased spouse may, as long as the surviving spouse receives at least one-half of the community’s value.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Fred Kirkes designated Joshua Kirkes, his son from a prior marriage, as the beneficiary of 83 percent of a community-owned individual retirement account (“IRA”). Gail Kirkes, Fred’s wife at the time of his death, had previously…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Mortensen v. KnightArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Gristy v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. In Re Monaghan's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cope v. RawlsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. OPTOLUM INC. v. CREE INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API