In Re the Estate of Fred N. Kirkes
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This case addresses whether a spouse, at death, can leave more than one-half of a community-owned retirement account to a non-spouse beneficiary. We conclude that, absent unusual circumstances, the deceased spouse may, as long as the surviving spouse receives at least one-half of the community’s value.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Fred Kirkes designated Joshua Kirkes, his son from a prior marriage, as the beneficiary of 83 percent of a community-owned individual retirement account (“IRA”). Gail Kirkes, Fred’s wife at the time of his death, had previously…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Mortensen v. KnightArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Gristy v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- In Re Monaghan's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cope v. RawlsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- OPTOLUM INC. v. CREE INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020