Legal Opinion

OPTOLUM INC. v. CREE INC.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided September 28, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00687Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA OPTOLUM, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:17CV687 ) CREE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge OptoLum, Inc. (“OptoLum”) sues Defendant Cree, Inc. (“Cree”) for patent infringement, violations of the Lanham Act, and unjust enrichment. (Doc. 32.) This matter is before the court on Cree’s motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (Doc. 190.) Because there is no genuine issue of material fact with respect to Cree’s argument that the Gen…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API