Legal Opinion
Spillman v. Beauchamp
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 9, 1962PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
Mary Edith Spillman and Charles Ash-brook brought an action for damages against the Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture of Kentucky, three regular employes and two temporary employes of the department, an employe of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, and two state policemen. The defendants moved to dismiss on the grounds that the complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted and that the court did not have jurisdiction of the subject matter. The court sustained the motion and entered judgment dismissing the action, from which judgment the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Sardo v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Lowe v. ConroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rowan County v. SloasKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Rupp v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Minger v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Kentucky Milk Marketing & Antimonopoly Commission v. Kroger Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Moores v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.