Legal Opinion

Norred v. Teaver

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 2013No. A12A2413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boggs, Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether OCGA § 9-3-72, which provides for a one-year statute of limitation for foreign objects “left in a patient’s body”, applies to only those foreign objects left in the body unintentionally. We hold that it does not, and we overrule our prior precedent limiting the application of the statute.

*509The underlying facts here are undisputed. In 2005, when Angela Norred chipped a molar, she saw Dr. Steven Teaver, who referred her for a root canal. Following the root canal, Norred returned to see Dr. Teaver who averred that he inserted a cotton pellet and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allrid v. Emory UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P. v. KullSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Parker v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Dalbey v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Abend v. KlaudtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HARRISON v. McAFEE Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. George v. Hercules Real Estate Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. George v. Hercules Real Estate Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. Thomas F. Cuffie v. Joetta ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API